Thank you.
We had a high level of hope when Mr. Annan publicized his final recommendations of the commission he was heading. They are comprehensive and they cover everything from freedom of movement to recommendations to investigate allegations of serious human rights violations. Mr. Annan referred to the situation as a human rights crisis before this latest round of attacks, and so we do feel there is value.
It should be noted, however, that the Government of Myanmar, and actually, Aung San Suu Kyi's spokesperson, said publicly that they were using the Annan commission as a shield—he used that term, “shield”—and he said that whenever the government faces pressure on Rakhine State, they can invoke the Annan commission as a way to attempt to alleviate that pressure. In other words, to us it's a suggestion that they're just using this and have no intention of actually acting on it. We hope that's not the case.
Those recommendations are sound. I think the international community has some strong content there to work with in terms of moving forward. The 1982 citizenship law is a problem. The Annan commission does recommend that the government revisit it . We would go far further and suggest the Government of Myanmar really needs to amend the citizenship law. There are a number of reasons why that law is problematic, which I won't get into now, but suffice it to say that the Rohingya are effectively denied citizenship. They were collectively stripped of citizenship, and that is a root problem.