Sure. Thank you for that opportunity.
Apart from disagreeing with the methodology of the Haslam et al. study on Canadian firms being better, nonetheless there is a crucial element of distortion in the Mining Association of Canada's representation of that study. It selectively uses that one piece of evidence, but discounts the crucial fact that the Haslam et al. study agrees that there are extraordinary levels of conflict involving Canadian mining companies. The debate is around proportionality, but not around the ethical and moral imperative to deal with them. I think it's a misrepresentation of a crucial component of that study with which I agree, even though I don't agree with part of the analysis. I think it's important to put that on the record and to bring to light the use of that data in a misleading interpretation by the Mining Association of Canada.