Maybe I can add to that.
A good example is the girl Tania, who I talked about. Actually, supply chain legislation right now is not going to assist Tania in having to meet the economic needs of her family. World Vision, supported by other government actors and Canadian supporters, has to come alongside and deal with what I think of as the push factors, providing alternative economic opportunities and trying to transition from more hazardous work to less hazardous work to try to improve the economic situation in the whole community so that there aren't those factors and necessarily having to push them to go and find work.
It's also important to remember that in addition to addressing those things and the broader complex social norms, there is a pull factor involved here as well that will have an impact in that particular situation. If we can address supply chains and encourage companies to figure out how we can improve the lives of folks involved all the way down.... One of the factors we see is that in the expectations for low-cost employment, pushing to the lowest-cost employees, often those are children and those who can be exploited, not adult workers. If we can actually incentivize companies through the supply chain, looking at the pull factors, to be concerned about this and so that there's an expectation around this, we can actually improve the economic likelihood that an adult can actually go to work, not making the companies look to the lower-cost alternative so that children can actually be doing things we think kids should be involved in like education and opportunities for safety and security.