If we're talking about due diligence in relation to businesses, then I would agree with Jo that it's as easy to do due diligence on child labour as on forced labour. I'm quite aware of Milton Friedman's full quote, and my point is that in many parts of the world—not Canada—child labour and forced labour are essentially legal because they're called something else or because the law is simply not enforced.
One of the questions that I think is worthwhile for you to ponder as legislators is what impact an extra-territorial law such as this one, which looks at due diligence on Canadian business supply chains, might have upon the law and policy of countries where child labour and forced labour occur. I think this is where the idea of precluding goods tainted with child and forced labour from Canadian markets becomes important, because so many of these countries have built their competitive advantage on low labour costs, including exploitation.
The more fundamental way to address child labour must be through community development, empowering families and kids in the ways that we've discussed already. It's important, in parallel with the law, to think about what development policy is doing. Canada is also an enormously important aid donor—I don't have to tell you this—so how aid policy in relation to development and humanitarian work is being shaped in order to address these issues is a question that needs to be asked as well.