I think there are two answers to your question.
The first one is IJM's area of expertise, which is that when laws are in force, they create a deterrent effect. You don't need to hold accountable every single individual who exploits children on either side of the screen; you just have to hold accountable enough to deter other would-be perpetrators from committing the same crime.
That has been our theory of change for a long time—that there will be a decrease in the exploitation when there is a credible deterrent, the enforcement of laws. There are many laws on the books, but when those laws are not enforced, they essentially become paper tigers. They might look scary, but they have no effect.
The vision is to give the laws teeth.