There is something I want to share with the members. I want to thank the clerk for finding if there was a precedent for what we discussed earlier, the unanimous consent to be able to move forward even though we didn't have the interpretation. Even with unanimous consent, the committee cannot overturn higher procedural authorities, a statute authority or an order of the House. In the case of bilingualism, it's protected under both the Official Languages Act and the Constitution Act, so, no, we could not provide unanimous consent to move forward even if we wanted to, just so members are aware of that.
Thank you very much, clerk, for finding that information for us.
Do you have a point of order, Mr. Brunelle-Duceppe?