Sorry to interrupt, Minister, I just have such little time. You know how this goes.
My question is this. If the right tool to hold business to account, according to your own report, is the ability to compel testimony and witness, how can that not be the right tool for you to give the ombudsperson?
I just want to follow up on that a little bit. If the Canadian companies, good Canadian companies, are doing good work abroad, compelling testimony and witness wouldn't impact them. It would impact companies that are not doing a good job, so why on earth would you not listen to the report you commissioned? What would be the harm in actually holding Canadian companies to a higher standard?