Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Maybe I could go back to you, Mr. Olthuis, for a second, to follow up on your most recent comments. You talk about the use of the powers of compelling witnesses to testify and compelling the production of documents for the purpose of untangling supply chains. I have to admit, I don't see how you could do that if the problem is a supply chain that is entirely located in another country. Presumably, the whole problem is that the Canadian company has not done due diligence, and therefore, its supply of compellable testimony is going to be pretty limited.
Am I wrong on that?