I believe that's for me, so I'll take it quickly.
I'm not too sure, John, whether you have seen the investigative report by a Canadian investigator, Andre Milne, regarding this tragedy, and the technical issues that led him to believe.... He investigated this tragedy from day one.
With regard to your specific question, he actually argued.... This is not concrete, I would say, evidence. This is analysis, per se. They tried to use a human shield in order to avoid further intensification of the conflict with the U.S. In the aftermath of the U.S. drone killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, instead of closing down the Iranian air space and declaring it dangerous for passenger flights, they allowed this to happen.
It's a public report published in Vancouver, in a weekly. I can send the report to the subcommittee for distribution. Mr. Milne has also given it to Ukrainian and Canadian authorities. He felt it was a deliberate Iranian action. That's why the Iranians asked every single passenger whether they had U.S. citizenship. There were a couple of passengers who had U.S. citizenship, but they were not on board. They were denied. The Iranians wanted to use this passenger airline as a human shield in order to prove.... In the beginning, they did not admit they did it. They said it was an accident, and it was due to U.S. hostilities, so they wanted to use it as a shield to protect themselves.