Yes, indeed. The Russian Federation is a very active member in the cultural field at UNESCO. As I mentioned, there are three main conventions that are pertinent in the context of the conflict itself, and those include the World Heritage Convention because within it states parties commit not to conduct any activity that harms natural or built heritage. There is also the 1970 convention on the illicit traffic in cultural property, which, again, Russia is a signatory to. Then, very importantly, because it's also linked to the Geneva conventions, is the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Culture Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. That is the most relevant one, I think, in the current context. It has clear stipulations that restrict what signatories can do.
It has two protocols. Russia isn't a signatory to the second protocol, which has some elements that give some more specificity to what those responsibilities are, but nevertheless it is signatory to the convention itself and its first protocol, which covers all the bases, essentially, of controlling what they do.