Thank you for your question.
If there is one thing I have learned over the last decade that I have taken a particular interest in Haiti, it is that in order for solutions to last, they must always be endogenous. They must always come from the community. They must come from civil society. Whether the issues are humanitarian or political, they must absolutely emerge from organizations, political parties and movements. As we have seen, very little has remained of all the aid given to Haiti in the last 10 years, because it was not done with the necessary consultations.
To come back to the Montana accord and a political solution to the crisis, we can't say today that this accord is going to solve all the problems. This crisis is multifactorial, as has been said. However, that accord represents the voice of a large number of civil society organizations. I therefore think that it has greater legitimacy in terms of political solutions than support for a government that obviously has no real consensus in Haiti.