At ICAN, because of the funding that we receive from different countries and from private sources, we have been able to get money into the country since September 2021. We were getting money in before, including Canadian support, but we've been getting money in since September 2021. It really would make a difference to have consistency. For example, we can't use Canadian grants to pay salaries to our colleagues who are on the ground. These kinds of things make a tremendous difference.
In terms of the rapid response issues, we do rapid response. We've been helping people get out. What we find across countries is that the foreign ministry that knows us will take referrals from us, but it's immigration that drops the ball across many countries. The only country that has been effective in doing the support with resettlement in a consistent way for women is Germany right now. This is very important.
Going back to the question of networks, this is exactly why we have the networks that we do, because at ICAN we can do things. We have access. We can help our partners in many different ways, and we are not politically bound by the limits that a UN agency might have. We have direct access to bilateral donors and to the partners, and we don't have the bureaucracy. We're able to get small amounts of money in to people and assist in terms of protection and evacuation, but also protection on the ground. We have a big protection guidance framework that we'd be happy to share with you that's very detailed in terms of the kinds of support that governments can provide.
Thank you.