We absolutely agree on that point.
It's just that I don't have a lot of time, and I'm trying to be as pragmatic as possible. I know that the committee's excellent analysts, who will help us draft our report, are working very intelligently and pragmatically as well.
I think it's been quite clear from the start: you're telling us you don't want direct military intervention. Instead you want material assistance for your security forces.
Now, if there are corrupt members among your security forces, or members who aren't entirely clean, what comes first, the chicken or the egg? Do you understand my question? It's important. Where do we start? Do we immediately provide direct material assistance to your police forces before resolving the corruption issues, or do we first solve the corruption problems and then assist the police forces?
We'll have to prepare recommendations at some point, which is precisely why I'm asking you the question.
Other witnesses may also want to answer that question.