Thank you very much.
I would like to ask Ms. Segura to pick up on something you said in terms of the multilateral foreign intervention. The reason I'm asking is that most of the witnesses, certainly the civil society witnesses we've heard, have been quite vociferously opposed to having a foreign military-style intervention.
One thing we heard is that a lot of the gangs are children who've been forcibly separated from their families, put in orphanages and then recruited into gangs. The spectre, particularly if Canada were to send soldiers to this, would be Canadian soldiers face to face with armed gangs and potentially in a shooting battle with what are essentially child soldiers.
The other thing, of course, is what you said about it being better than the alternative of inaction. I think we've heard a lot of alternatives throughout the course of this study, including sanctions and stopping the arms. The oligarchs who are supporting these gangs are the ones we need to be going after. We need to stop the arms from getting in through the border, among a number of other things that we've been told, and also include capacity-building for the police, the local police.
I just wonder, given all of that, what your reasoning is for wanting to have a multilateral force.