Yes, thank you for the opportunity.
I completely agree with Mr. Brender on the need to invest in the humanitarian aspect as well to ensure we stimulate the development process. That's why I say that it isn't a question of boots on the ground, even in security matters. It's mainly a socioeconomic problem, and Canada can provide its assistance in that area. That's also why we want programs that can help unemployed and disadvantaged young people enter the economy. They exist outside the economy. Haiti is a deeply unequal country, and these kinds of programs are necessary.
The arrival of boots on the ground in neighbourhoods won't solve the problem. It would even be dangerous because, if Canada says it's considering the possibility of sending in troops, Haitians will sit there and wait for Canada's response. It's like Mr. Henry, who waits and does nothing. However, there are things that we can do.
I say no to foreign military intervention. We said so in the Montana Accord. That's what I wanted to add.
I have one final point to make. Mr. Brender mentioned the earthquake that occurred in Haiti. International assistance did arrive, but 10 or so days later. At first, and particularly in the first 3 to 5 days, it was Haitians who intervened, and we witnessed Haitian solidarity. That's why I say that being Haitian means that we can do it. We don't have everything we need to do it, but we want to see investments in our long-term development. We want a state that doesn't attack our rights or resources. I would remind you that 50% of Haiti's population doesn't have access to health care. We need investment in that field, and the Zanmi Lasante model is promising.