I have another question for you, Ms. Salehi. Maybe I'll ask that, and then you can answer both together if you'd like.
Parliament often recognizes acts of genocide. Those are seen as particularly important in the context of contemporary events. At the same time, we have not typically recognized historical genocides before a certain point, not because genocides haven't happened for a very long time in human history but because it's potentially more fraught for parliamentary committees and for parliamentarians to evaluate questions of history. At the same time, I think we are more likely to recognize those historical genocides if there is a contemporary resonance. I think of the Armenian genocide as one example of a past event that feels very immediate because of current events.
Could you speak about why it's important for us to evaluate, in the context of present events, this historical question of the 19th-century genocide that you spoke of?