I totally echo my two fellows on the Taliban, specifically on the Shia. When it comes to the recent events, I see it more from the ISIS side than the Taliban side. Every incident and every suicide bombing that's happened was claimed by ISIS. You can find the documents. That's the thing I acknowledge on that. There should be an accountability mechanism to find the truth.
I found it more anti-Shia than anti-Hazara. When some of our Shia countrymen were equipped and recruited by Iran under the Fatemiyoun and then sent to Syria to fight against ISIS, ISIS at that time told us it would take revenge against the Shia. I see all of that as anti-Shia, rather than anti-Hazara, because we have a lot of Hazaras who are not Shia and who are not a target. We also have a lot of Shia who are also not Hazara, and they are targeted. That's the one point I want to mention.
On the other point that you told us, as lawyers, we have a principle: The law is enforced and the law is applicable to all events that happened after the enforcement of the special law. However, if you go to historical events, it's impossible to really document them. There are a lot of crimes in history. We wouldn't find a limit to how far we can go to reinvestigate this kind of incident.
As a lawyer, that's very difficult for me—