This is a very easy question if we look at some parallels from history. I usually share my personal story that my son is the first generation in my family to suffer from Russia, from Moscow. It was the tradition in the USSR stage of development of this empire that the first priority for Moscow was to have the children under the power of the authoritarian type of ideology.
Many people in Ukraine who had a connection with different protest groups, even during the USSR period, spent years and years in prison, separated from their children, many of whom were hosted by a very proactive Communist group, which took the children into their families and tried to re-educate them.
It's not something new for us, for Ukrainians. That's why I'm usually trying to share a parallel. This is genocide, an ongoing war for our nation, for the identity of Ukrainians, which wasn't started in 2014. The tools that Moscow is using now are the same as they were before. The separation of children from their families and the re-education for those who were in occupied territories for many years—from 2014—are forming the potential tool for the continuation of this war of Ukrainians against Ukrainians. Try to just imagine a boy who was only 10 years of age when Donetsk was occupied and who suffered under the Russian propaganda for 10 years, and now this boy has taken up arms and is fighting against Ukrainian soldiers. This is the best human capital for the Russian army, because Russia is willing to continue this war for years.
It's truly a long war, but when we are speaking about tools and methods, Moscow is using the same ones as before. It's nothing new for us, but we are calling for this practice to stop and we are sharing our opinion about the unacceptable use of children against the Ukrainian nation, and how it is unacceptable to change their identity. This is because we have to survive, not only physically as a state, but as a society with a new generation of Ukrainians, which we will do, all of this country, after the end of the war.