In terms of tying strings, I would love to discuss this further. It would be great as the subcommittee considers their recommendations. For example, I look at what has worked on other types of inclusion that are really critical. We still have a way to go on gender, for example, but we have found that bilateral and multilateral institutions have found it critical to ensure that gender-transformative and disability-inclusive education is embedded within those structures.
Maha is an amazing example of an expert within ECW on disability-inclusive education, yet we also need to make sure that there are those types of people with those resources within every education cluster that's responding on the humanitarian front and across that whole continuum that you and Mr. Jenkins discussed of humanitarianism through to development in a holistic way to really reach children.
Yes, like Mr. Shriver and others mentioned, data must be improved while we are acting and accelerating action. It's not something we should wait for. We should not let perfect be the enemy of the good, so to speak. Like Ms. Richler just said, it's absolutely critical that the current SDG process and whatever may come next, which is, indeed, being negotiated by member-state governments right now, have a very strong voice by member-state governments—as the governments of Canada and then Namibia are leading that process for the pact for the future—to make sure that disability-inclusive education is front and centre and that children and youth with disabilities are not just there once for one consultation but really there fully with policy-makers throughout the whole process.
Thank you.