Could I add something on the question about what more Canada could do?
We entirely support the comments made by Ms. Leung. I would say there are three key things.
The first is, of course, that the Canadian government can and should call—unequivocally—for Jimmy Lai's immediate release. They should do that publicly and in their bilateral engagement with China and Hong Kong officials.
Second, we'd ask that Canada also raise concerns about this case and what it represents in multilateral fora. In the next number of weeks, we have, at the Human Rights Council, the U.N. special rapporteur on torture giving her annual report. We would expect to see Canada raising very grave concerns about Andy Li and Jimmy Lai when they have an opportunity to speak in the interactive dialogue with respect to torture. Being silent, we think, would be the wrong thing to do there.
Third, we would say this, following on what Ms. Leung said: There are 300,000 Canadians in Hong Kong currently. There are over 200 Canadian companies in Hong Kong currently. Jimmy Lai's case is a cautionary tale. What we've seen is, essentially, the state-sponsored theft of a business. A hugely successful media company was shut down by order of the executive. Every single Canadian company operating in Hong Kong with the current national security and sedition laws in place is risking action like that being taken against them if any of their employees like a tweet the authorities don't like, speak out of turn or stand up to the authorities. That is something of grave concern for all Canadian businesses and people currently in Hong Kong. The Canadian government must speak out for them.