I'm not familiar with the specific case, but I can tell you the contours of this case are a model that we're seeing in Venezuela and elsewhere, again and again.
I mentioned the authorities seizing the headquarters of El Nacional. It was, basically, after the supreme court of Venezuela ordered it to pay more than $13 million U.S. in damages for alleged defamation. You see the control of the courts, the use of defamation charges, the use of fraud and the heavy fines that come with it as a sort of larger element of a problem where governments are trying to close any dissenting media outlets and carry out a campaign of stigmatization and repression against the media. Very few newspapers, websites or radio stations in Venezuela can criticize authorities anymore; they fear reprisals and they're really made to self-censor. We've seen this again and again, and certainly Venezuela is a model for this.
We also saw that in Venezuela, in 2017, the constituent assembly passed a very vague law, which they call the “law against hatred”, which forbids political parties from promoting fascism, hatred and intolerance and establishes prison sentences of up to 20 years for publishing anything that they call messages of intolerance and hated. However, it's being misused in a lot of ways. During the COVID-19 state of emergency that was imposed, many people sharing or publishing information on social media questioning officials or their policies around the pandemic have been charged with incitement to hatred and other crimes.