Mr. Sobhani, the point you just made is so important. Canada already lists so many of the subsidiaries as terrorist organizations. Why haven't we listed the mother ship as a terrorist organization?
I think that Ms. Boniadi's calls to action in her opening statement—the designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization, the use of universal jurisdiction by Canada, and Canadian government support for a gender apartheid designation—are three very strong and important calls to action. I do want to reiterate my support for all three of those. I see a lot of heads nodding.
I want to add as well that a bill I have a bill before Parliament, Bill C-350, includes IRGC listing, but it would also allow victims of torture and extrajudicial killing to sue the Iranian regime in Canadian courts.
I want to ask.... Maybe this is a more difficult question, but I think it's important to get some feedback.
What we desire is to defend the human rights of the Iranian people and protect Canada from this regime. We also want to see an end to this regime and the emergence of a free, democratic Iran that responds to the aspirations of everyone here. That would seem to require the presentation of a coherent political alternative to the current regime. We know that there are many people talking about this, but there's also a lot of division among different kinds of proposals for that political alternative.
I would welcome comments from anyone who wants to weigh in on the chances of presenting a unified political alternative to the current regime and what role that would play in the freedom struggle.
I see Ms. Boniadi and then Ms. Afshin-Jam. I probably have about two minutes between the two of you.