Thank you very much.
That's kind of what I was getting at; meanwhile, humanitarian aid is not getting there.
Sudan was probably already one of the places with the highest child malnutrition rate in the world before the conflict began. It was already estimated that 600,000 children were malnourished.
Right now, I would say that the major international players are playing Risk with Sudan, if I may use that expression.
All you're asking for—and this is the message I'm hearing today—is that these actors facilitate the entry of humanitarian aid and impose an arms embargo as an absolute must. If that were done, there may be some hope.
Did I understand you correctly?