Yes, I agree totally about the slowness of the ICC, and a previous prosecutor always told us that she didn't have enough resources to investigate such huge scale crimes in Ukraine. The new prosecutor, three months before the war, said that we had enough resources in Ukraine to investigate with our own prosecutors, and that he was not going to open a case.
I'm not sure how many resources they have now. I do agree that ICC should be supported and financially supported by Canada, but I also agree that Canada could help Ukrainian investigators, first of all, with different pressure in the area of justice.
We have already been contacted by the Canadian Bar Association, and they proposed their help in opening the UJ cases not only in Canada, but also in South American countries and others who have this possibility, like Argentina and so on.
I do believe that Canada is already doing a lot in this area and is ready to help, but I also think that we should co-operate more in the linkage of evidence, and I agree that Ukrainians want to make all crimes accountable, and we really need some special tribunal and special procedures.
We do believe, for example, that Russians are now using FAB-500 aerial bombs. Those are 500-kilogram, high-explosive, general-purpose aerial bombs, which they were using before—the same weapon—indiscriminately in Afghanistan and in Syria.
The pattern of attacks and linkage or evidence are something we could co-operate on and investigate together, and probably there will be a lot of the same perpetrators who committed the war crimes before what's happened in Ukraine. It's very important to fight impunity and to show those people who committed those crimes in Ukraine and beforehand that they will be punished. This is very important for the future, not only of Ukraine but also of other countries that are threatened by Russia.