That's very helpful. Thank you so much.
I'm limited in my time, and I do have a question for Mr. Eboe-Osuji.
You got my attention when you talked about the natural evolution of international human rights law and that it would be going toward declaring peace as a human right. I have a couple of questions about how that might work. I know we don't have a lot of time.
Would you clarify, for instance, the definition of peace versus security? Then, obviously, the idea of who is an aggressor state is something that can be disputed. Somebody's liberator might be another person's aggressor, especially if it's a third party or an alliance coming in to defend another country.
Finally, my concern might be that, if you are a military personnel who is participating in a conflict under orders, you know that, if you do things like rape, torture and extrajudicial killings, those are crimes against humanity. Those are illegal. What about peace? Would the mere participation in that conflict cause those military personnel to then be potentially breaking human rights laws?
I know these are big questions. If you don't have time, I would very much invite you to send answers in writing, unless there's time later, but, please, take the time you have to respond.