Thank you so much for raising that.
Our organization has been working really hard to try to reverse some of the hate narratives that have happened. What we found in our study, since 2024, was that the kind of hate speech that emerged within southeast Asia, in the past two to three years, echoed the exact kinds of hate narratives that the Myanmar military junta used leading up to the Rohingya genocide in 2017—it was to justify it.
Unfortunately, this has caused a lot of the public opinion to shift towards deportation of the Rohingya and pushing back the Rohingya. We saw a few boats arrive at the shores in Aceh, Indonesia, and Malaysia, and they were pushed back. That resulted in children's deaths because they were dehydrated. These boat journeys take from about two weeks to two months. A lot of times, some of these boats were also lost. The engines died, or the traffickers ran away. People are exploited on board the boats while they're travelling on the high sea. Later on, they're met with protests from the locals, saying that they're not welcome, even though they're genocide survivors.
States often lean towards public opinion. I've had a chance to sit down with policy-makers from the current ruling party in Malaysia, who told me to talk to China and the Myanmar military junta to see how many of us they will take back because they can no longer receive or take care of Rohingyas in the country. That's the level of hostility that has existed in southeast Asia.
Again, as I've mentioned, the ASEAN does not have a one-size-fits-all or refugee policy that is encompassing enough to accept and integrate the Rohingya or other refugees into southeast Asia. That actually causes a lot more problems because it leaves a lot of people in the public confused about when they're going to leave and how they're going to continue living alongside locals. I think that is the root cause of all of this hate speech. A lot of politicians also use it as a way to win elections, to securitize and to show up as heroes.