Taking the last question first, we basically started that immediately after launching the FTA negotiations in July 2005. The consultative group was struck about then; I think the first meeting was in the late summer of 2005.
To your question about impact assessments, the government does a whole range of internal assessments and analyses before we enter into FTAs. In my response to an earlier question, I think I alluded to some work that was done on modelling the benefits for Canada. I don't have the document in front of me, and to be perfectly honest, my recollection is that we also did model some impacts for the Korean side, which showed considerably less benefit to it.
We're in the process of basically updating and refining that study, and our intent would be to make the results of that public when they're available, but it may not be until later this fall.
With respect to the auto sector, we have also done internal analyses and assessments of the impact in the automotive sector. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, the conclusions were that the impact would be very, very limited, as a result of the factors I mentioned. We're starting from a low tariff, and 85% of what we produce is sold in the United States. Basically there are three kinds of Korean cars coming into our market: those made by Hyundai and Kia, which will be produced in the United States and shipped duty free under NAFTA at a certain point; and those made by Daewoo International, a company owned by GM and accounting for about 30% of what's coming in from Korea. So these are coming in from General Motors. The other two companies, as I say, will be producing in the United States. Alabama is already open; they haven't met the NAFTA rules of origin yet, but they intend to do so. Kia has announced that it will be constructing a $1.2 billion facility in Georgia, and that will account for Kia vehicles.