Ultimately the decision on whether or not the agreement is accepted would be taken at a political level. My responsibilities are to negotiate the best agreement I can. Yes, I wouldn't close an agreement that I didn't think was in the best interests of this country and one that I didn't think was worth bringing back for ministers to consider. As I've indicated, we think tackling non-tariff measures in Korea is an important objective and we're actively pursuing it in negotiation.
I should mention that apart from specific measures—because the industry is also concerned that whatever you negotiate today could be replaced by different measures tomorrow—arguably what's more important is to build into the FTA appropriate mechanisms that you have going forward for being able to address these measures, something that basically holds officials' feet to the fire, so that every time a measure comes up, you've got a mechanism for pursuing them. I think that would also be an important outcome in the agreement.
All I can tell you from the standpoint of a negotiator is that my team and I are putting a very high priority on addressing non-tariff measures in this. But whether it's ultimately signed will be a political call made by the government.