Yes, there's been a lot of commentary in this committee to the effect that the committee hasn't had time to prepare a full report. I can see the value of trying to make that clear in the substance of the report itself. Normally I'm on another committee—the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs—and we are struggling similarly with trying to get something wrapped up quickly. I think one doesn't want to present these things as being something other than what they are. I could be wrong, but I think there's a general consensus that this is something that's being done because of a lack of time to draw up something that's more complete.
For example, I think by definition it could not have included the testimony that was heard today, given the fact that the motion was written before the testimony of the various witnesses today. So it's not possible that the report could have incorporated those comments. Indeed, as a practical matter, we know that the committee Hansards take some time, so it seems to me a fairly logical to include something of this nature when one is dealing with a report that is temporary. That way, the House will know what it is dealing with, and we ought to be full and frank in what we propose in these committees.