In the case of agriculture, we understand that one of the greatest problems is the import of grain.
Another area that's important for us would be cattle raising. This not only includes meat but also dairy products. Maybe the closest comparison point is the one we have with the agreement with the United States, in which it is very clear that the agriculture in Central America is going to be totally annihilated. The subsidy for grain in the United States amounts to $1.8 billion American. In El Salvador, we have zero dollars in subsidies. Poultry, for example, is 400% more expensive than the subsidized price in the United States. In those conditions, it's impossible to compete. If we add to this the example of Mexico, with NAFTA, it is evident how 2.5 million white corn producers had to go bankrupt because of the importing of corn, much of which is transgenic, from the United States.
The theme of agriculture is very important, but from our perspective it's not the central theme of free trade agreements. Rusa has already mentioned that the volume of trade between Canada and Central America is less than 1%. What's really significant within these agreements are investments, services, and public contracts.