I think our friend here is out of order because we're discussing
the softwood lumber agreement that has been reached, and not Mr. Julian's motion.
Mr. Julian states in his motion that profound changes have been made to the agreement. We have heard some arguments, but Mr. Menzies' refer more to the agreement, when that is not necessarily the point of the motion we have before us. Indeed, this motion is intended to allow all members present to ascertain why the various forestry associations have reacted the way they have to this agreement.
I think we should vote on the motion.