Mr. Chair, that is not Mr. Paquette's motion. It's very clear: it's overruling your decision on the admissibility of motion number two. That was Mr. Paquette's motion. We then moved to consideration of motion number two.
Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC
Mr. Chair, that is not Mr. Paquette's motion. It's very clear: it's overruling your decision on the admissibility of motion number two. That was Mr. Paquette's motion. We then moved to consideration of motion number two.
See context to find out what was said next.