I just want to explain. And of course the committee is free to challenge the chair if it wants. I want to just explain why I believe this motion isn't in order without 48 hours notice unless the committee agrees to hear it. That is, if we start allowing any motion that is loosely connected with the subject matter of the committee meeting, then the 48 hours notice is really a moot requirement; it will never apply, because you can always find a loose connection.
I don't believe that the connection is direct enough to allow this motion to come forth without 48 hours notice, and I haven't been convinced otherwise. Do you understand why I believe it's important to make this decision and to stick to what I think was the intent of the rules laid out by this committee when we started to operate?
Is there any other discussion on that? No? Then I rule that motion is not in order without 48 hours notice, which has not been provided.
Is there any other business before the committee?
Mr. LeBlanc.