I'm not quite sure what you're referring to. In my analysis of this agreement and the alternative to this agreement, which is litigation, I said let's accept 90% probability of success on key litigation cases. I believe, and the best legal advice I get and my experience in the industry tells me, that process will be drawn out for months, possibly years, and then you have to begin the whole process of unwinding the duty entries, which we know could take from two to three years under normal circumstances, because there are literally thousands of entries. Basically, under the litigation scenario, even if you're successful, you're looking at something like two, three, or four years, or maybe never, to actually get cash back. That's what I'm saying.
I'm saying the seven- to nine-year agreement is a seven- to nine-agreement. Yes, it has termination provisions, just as virtually all international agreements have. That doesn't mean those agreement are six-month or twelve-month agreements. They are permanent agreements, and in this case, permanent is seven to nine years.