On the termination clause, that was an ask of the Canadian industry. We had a couple of iterations in terms of the Government of Canada to the Government of the United States. I don't want to reveal all the intricacies of where we started and where we ended, but the idea of the 23 months was really driven by the desire to have a 12-month standstill. In fact, my understanding was that the industry would rather have a standstill than the longer termination period. So the idea was to get a termination sufficiently long at the front of the agreement that we would have immunity from any trade actions guaranteed for three years. The way to do that was the 23-month, 30-day quick termination provision, and then the 12 months in the event that the Americans terminated.
On July 31st, 2006. See this statement in context.