Minister, since your answers to two questions you were asked did not satisfy me, I want to come back to them.
First of all, who proposed the 23-month termination clause? And why did you go along with that proposal, which was not part of the April 27 agreement?
Second, do you intend to table legislation on the softwood lumber agreement in the fall if the two pre-conditions for the agreement going forward are met—namely that 95% of the industry goes along with it and agrees to terminate all litigation currently under way?