You didn't answer my question about where litigation could go. Essentially the decision on Tembec, which comes through the Court of International Trade, is appealable once. It's a 12-month appeal, and that appeal goes to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. That is the case with Tembec. In the case of the ECC judgment, we have suspended that judgment.
So I ask you again, specifically where do you come up with this two- to three-year figure, and where does the Prime Minister come up with the seven-year figure, when everybody in the industry certainly knows we're in the final stages of litigation and we're in the final stages of actually winning both on the issue of subsidy and on the issue of injury?