Mr. Emerson, I'd like to move on to the running rules. I would submit that as a CEO, you would have opposed the running rules in this draft agreement. It's retroactive, and these are monthly penalties. Essentially, companies that write to us as members of the international trade committee won't know whether they're earning or losing money on a given product in a given month. So my question is, do you understand why companies are so upset by running rules that make this draft agreement non-commercially viable?
My final question is, if this deal is rejected, which certainly seems to be the case, by the industry and almost certainly by Parliament, will you reverse the suspension of the ECC action and move within cabinet to provide loan guarantees to the industry?