Certainly.
When you have $500 million in cash going to the Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports, which represents about 53% of the American producers, it gives me lots of pause.
I remember surfing the web around the time of the agreement and reading one quote that was saying, yes, and we're going to use that to make sure the Canadians follow the letter of the agreement exactly. A couple of days later, somebody must have gotten on to it, because he said, well, that's not exactly what we meant. But I think they had it the first time.
Having interfaced with the USTR and the coalition—not speaking on behalf of my association, but from a personal viewpoint—I think that even if you have this agreement, it's only a matter of when you get Lumber V, unless there are better exit ramps produced in your 18-month period.
I think you've got $500 million that's going to go to the coalition, with which they can well build a war chest and say, hey, this was a really great deal last time. Don't you want to get in on it next time? I mean, there's an economic model that's now been proven.
The second thing I'm not sure of is what exactly the U.S. government is doing with the other $500 million. That's more of a rhetorical question, but it's not very clear to me.