Thank you, and thank you for your kind words.
Good morning, and thank you very much for the opportunity to join you today to discuss the Canada-U.S. softwood lumber agreement, and what is clearly the greatest demonstration of trade diplomacy and cooperation between our two countries in a generation.
On July 1, the Minister of International Trade, David Emerson, and U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab initialled an historic agreement to bring an end to the long-standing lumber dispute. In so doing, Canada's new government achieved what no government before it could: an end to this damaging dispute in terms that are highly favourable to Canada, with many elements that industry and provinces had specifically requested.
This agreement represents a carefully negotiated balance of interests that guarantees a stable and predictable environment for our industry, and provides long-sought-after certainty for the hundreds of communities and hundreds of thousands of Canadians who depend on it for their livelihoods. We have before us today a deal that Canada can be proud of--indeed, the best deal possible. It will mean the end of punitive U.S. duties, the return of U.S. $4.3 billion to Canadian industry within four to eight weeks, and the arrival of much-needed stability and certainty. But before I speak in detail about the benefits and the process of the past several months, I want to talk about the key factors that allowed us to get to this point.
The softwood lumber industry in this country represents a critical sector of our economy, directly impacting some 300 communities and more than 300,000 Canadian forestry workers and their families nationwide. So it came as no surprise that upon taking office, Prime Minister Stephen Harper made resolving this dispute a key priority for his government. Reflecting a new era of cooperation between Canada and the United States, the Prime Minister and President Bush agreed this spring to find an end to this damaging dispute. This decisiveness and leadership supported the efforts and unique industry experience of Minister Emerson. They also supported the contributions of cabinet, as well as my efforts in Washington along with those of our strong negotiating team, as we sought to achieve the best deal for Canada.
Provinces and industry were consulted extensively at every step in the negotiating process to reach the original April 27 framework agreement, through subsequent weeks of very intense discussions with the United States, and even into the very final hours leading up to the conclusion of negotiations and the initialling of the deal on July 1. The views of the provinces and industry have been important for this government and for the negotiating team, and were always carefully considered as the agreement was finalized. Without exception, this process has been one of open and constructive dialogue.
On August 9, Ministers Emerson, Bernier, Lunn, and Flaherty and I met in Toronto with some 25 industry CEOs, key decision-makers, to discuss the agreement and to gain a sense of their respective positions. At that time, Minister Emerson again emphasized that negotiations were concluded. He publicly announced that companies would have until the close of business today, August 21, to signal their support for the deal. He made a commitment to continue discussion with all parties regarding specific and administrative clarifications necessary to make this deal a reality. In recent days, information packages and letters of intent have been distributed to more than 300 Canadian lumber companies for their response.
To be clear, the alternative to this agreement is continued costly litigation with no guarantee of a more favourable result, continued U.S. duties punishing Canadian industry workers and communities, and an unstable business environment for this important sector of our economy. It is important that the implications of a litigation strategy be clearly understood. Even if Canada were ultimately successful in this latest round of litigation, without a negotiated settlement, the U.S. lumber lobby could launch a new case against imports of Canadian softwood lumber the following day, starting a new lumber dispute. This agreement prevents that.
Provinces and industry asked for a deal that secures the return of billions of dollars in duty deposits. This agreement delivers on that. In addition, the government has developed a mechanism to maximize the benefits of the refund of deposits by ensuring that most of the money will be back in the hands of our companies within weeks of the agreement's entry into force. The estimated $4.3 billion to be returned to our companies marks a significant infusion of capital for the industry and will benefit workers and communities. Without this mechanism, it could take U.S. Customs up to two years to return all the money to Canadian exporters.
Provinces and industry asked for a deal that provides stability and predictability to the Canadian lumber industry. This government delivers on that. The agreement will last seven to nine years, long enough to help stabilize the market environment for our industry, despite what misinformation has indicated regarding the termination clause. During this time, the U.S. will be prohibited from initiating further trade action.
Provinces and industry asked for a deal that includes the protection of an enhanced termination clause. This agreement delivers that. Termination clauses are a standard feature of international trade agreements. What's more, under international law, without a specific termination clause, agreements may be terminated at any time with 12 months' notice.
This agreement provides for 24 months of dispute-free trade, and it also contains an important provision whereby the United States cannot initiate new trade action for an additional 12 months in the event that it terminates the agreement. This is a powerful disincentive to early U.S. termination. The absence of U.S. trade remedy action under the agreement will offer a period of stability for the industry, which will allow Canadian companies to make the investment necessary to ensure their competitiveness going forward. However, termination of an international trade agreement is a serious decision that countries do not take lightly. Both Canada and the United States agree that we have a strong interest in maintaining the rights and privileges that we attained under the agreement. Termination by either side is highly unlikely.
Provinces and industry asked for a deal that maintains policy flexibility for provinces to manage their forests. Again, this agreement delivers. We have negotiated anti-circumvention provisions that fully protect provincial forest management practices, including a full carve-out for B.C.'s new market pricing system.
Another example of how this agreement will help Canadian companies remain competitive is its third country provision. Under certain circumstances, should third countries take U.S. market share from Canadian companies, a percentage of export charges paid will be refunded.
Last week, Premier Campbell announced British Columbia's unequivocal support for the agreement. At the same time, significant support from the B.C. lumber industry was publicly announced. Within a day, the Ontario government came forward in support of the deal. On Friday, Quebec industry announced large consensus and support for the agreement, joining senior Quebec government officials who also indicated their support. Atlantic provinces and industry have long supported the negotiated settlement achieved between Canada and the United States.
I'd like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who has expressed support for the agreement and assisted in bringing us to where we are today, including Premier Campbell and Premier Charest, ministers from the governments of British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia, and numerous private sector representatives. The initiative and leadership these individuals have shown are truly impressive and have been critical to the result we have achieved together. I am most appreciative of this support.
This broad and emerging consensus in support of the agreement affirms the direction and leadership Canada's government has demonstrated on this file. While no one should presuppose the final outcome of the decisions individual softwood producers must make today, the government is confident that it will receive quite substantial support from the industry to move ahead.
On this basis, Prime Minister Harper's government intends to introduce enabling legislation when Parliament returns in September, with the objective of seeing the agreement enter into force in October 2006. Canada and the United States will then be able to fully turn the page and direct our full attention to building a stronger, more competitive North America.
Disputes of this nature and the challenges inherent in the process of resolving them can often draw some down the simple paths of rhetoric and political posturing. Today I urge each of you to resist the simple paths and acknowledge what has been achieved for Canada. It's an achievement that truly bridges regional and partisan lines.
This negotiated settlement marks an enormous step towards ensuring progress and prosperity for the future. It protects the best interests of our softwood lumber industry and the best interests of our country as a whole. That's what Canadians expected of their new government. The government identified the resolution of the softwood lumber industry as a key priority. It is clear that the government has delivered on this commitment.
Mr. Chairman, thank you. I would be pleased to take your questions.