The market price system, as you point out, is a very important element in the positions of the B.C. government and the B.C. industry. The planning of this has been under way for three or four years now, and it is moving the B.C. industry into an auction-based approach for establishing stumpage fees. That has been, as I'm sure you're very much aware, one of the key points of difference between the U.S. and the Canadian industries. Their allegation was that the Canadian industry stumpage was set by the government and not based on a transparent auction system. This new system does provide for that. So that in itself can contribute to a more satisfactory relationship between the two industries in the future.
You mentioned the pine beetle. The pine beetle is not only a very serious element in the health of the B.C. industry--because the pine beetle kill is starting to move into Alberta--but it's also starting to move down into the United States. So they could have the problem in those two jurisdictions as well.
It becomes a significant issue because there's a certain period after which the trees no longer provide good softwood lumber because of damage by the pine beetle to the quality of the fibre. There's a certain period of time during which the trees have to be harvested, and those harvesting practices are dealt with or addressed in the anti-circumvention clause. It's been told to me by both the B.C. and Alberta industries that those are important factors that the agreement includes, so any adjustments that are made to address the pine beetle problem won't be regarded as circumvention of the agreement.