Mr. Chair, I would like to address the issue of this particular round of litigation.
It started immediately following a five-year deal of managed trade to the SLA in which there was no chance of using that timeframe for any complaint against Canada for subsidy or threat of injury. Within a week Lumber IV is launched. Common sense says no wonder we're winning this round; how can you go in less than a week from nothing to something that is all threat of injury and subsidy? So I would say that with respect to the cases we have won—I don't know the relevance in Lumber V—the one group that has made a fortune, and continues to make a fortune, is the legal entity in this softwood lumber dispute. Let this industry move on with certainty.