Mr. Higginbotham and Mr. Perkins, you have come out in support of this agreement basically because of your desire to ensure stability in the industry. You've downplayed the termination clause, which would see everything fall apart in a maximum of three years.
Looking at the organization or politicians, or whatever, in the lumber industry, of the coalition, how confident are you really that we're looking at seven to nine years as opposed to something less, a three-year maximum? Knowing the history that Mr. Perkins has gone on at length about, concerning who is on the other side and the difficulties you've had with them over the years, why are you so assured and why do you not feel that Lumber V is not that far away in any event?