I have one further comment in conclusion. Aside from clearing up a lot of misconceptions today.... I live, by the way, in a riding that is very dependent on the lumber industry. Many of the jobs in my riding are tied to some sort of stability. Not only does this agreement bring that long-term stability--seven to nine years--but it also sounds as though there have been some considerations given to the social aspect of things as well.
I was very pleased to hear you answer the question on the social housing part, and I think it's wonderful that we're going to actually have a group of people who are outside of government looking at this and other aspects of the softwood lumber agreement. I see nothing but positives here.
Thank you very much for the information today.