No.
For the overseeing of the operations of the working groups within the softwood lumber agreement, we have the technical working groups, the discussions on possible exit strategies for regions, etc. All those activities of government interaction will be governed by the binational softwood lumber committee. While the composition has yet to be agreed upon, it is expected that this committee will be led by senior government officials from both the United States and Canada. So when you think of government-to-government discussion in whatever areas as it relates to the softwood lumber agreement, it is the binational softwood lumber committee that will be the overseeing body for those activities. That is the body to which the working groups would report, etc.
With respect to the other binational industry council, that is a council composed only of industry leaders from both countries in the softwood lumber sector. As I noted, basically they have an overall mandate to discuss: the promotion of expanded use of wood products, educating consumers on sustainable wood products, and promoting the use of wood in green building standards. That is the industry-to-industry interaction, and this is done through that foundation.
I think that is the primary difference between the two. I hope I've made myself clear as to the different operations of the two lead bodies that are envisioned to be created through the softwood lumber agreement.