I think we have to make a distinction between a dumping or subsidy inquiry and a safeguard inquiry. A dumping and subsidy inquiry is quite different. It involves, as you mentioned a few moments ago, CCRA starting the process and then sending the information to us to make a preliminary determination of injury. If and when we do that, CCRA then makes its determination as to whether or not there is dumping or subsidy. Then we start our final determination on that subject.
If we're talking about safeguards, CCRA is really not involved. The complaint is either sent to us by the government or we are approached directly by the industry. The complaint there has to do with a substantial increase of imports from a particular source, or from all sources. The tribunal then proceeds to determine whether that increase in imports has caused injury to domestic producers. There is no mention in the safeguard process of dumping or subsidy.
In both cases, when the tribunal makes a determination of injury--or not, as the case may be--it's always accompanied by a statement that gives detailed reasons as to how the tribunal arrived at its conclusion.