That wouldn't exactly be the model. We wouldn't be enforcing our laws against the Government of Guatemala. We would all be agreeing to a standard that every country would meet, and when there was a violation of that standard....
Currently under the NAFTA model, the chapter 11 model, the independent organization, the company involved, has a right to enforce the rights that all the countries agreed to in the particular context of its case or its dispute. When that happens, they choose from a number of international conventions regulating arbitration processes that have already been agreed to, and that initiates the process of getting parties to file their statements of claim, having an exchange of documentation, and having a legal hearing, which then is enforced by a panel of arbitrators. Sometimes the arbitrators are selected one from each country, and then a third is selected by the parties themselves, or there's another selection process. Then that panel goes forward and enforces or hears the case, hears the evidence, decides what the facts are, and applies them to the context of what was going on, the labour rights that have been agreed to, and then it issues a decision, whether the complaint is upheld or not. And if there is a finding that there's been a violation, then that panel has wide ability to enforce its finding and to provide a wide list of remedies.
That's the model, in a nutshell.