The motion contains three specific points. I don't have any objection to the second and third. As for the first, it seems to me that many people have reservations, mainly when it comes to negotiations.
However, at a minimum, some facts must be part of the public debate. People must know the sacrifices the negotiators are prepared to make on matters that concern individuals or businesses. The point is not to specify the percentage that will be applied to one element or another or to reveal the exact bargaining strategies. However, people, entrepreneurs, businesses and industrial concerns must know whether the government wants to sacrifice their specific area for the benefit of another. There has to be a debate. Priorities must be set.
So let's work together to find the specific terms that will determine what should be disclosed to business people, for example. I'm going to wait for someone to suggest to me the specific words concerning the idea of immediately disclosing the government's orientations, at least the orientations that provide us with some context in the negotiations and that people are entitled to know.