A range of legal proceedings followed the bringing into force of the agreement. A precondition for bringing the agreement into force was the liquidation of duties and the return of the $4.5 billion to Canada. This was accomplished. However, the authority of the softwood lumber agreement is not the determining factor for the courts. It was done through a mooting process, and a lot of the legal proceedings we're seeing now are following up on the mooting. A lot of housecleaning or procedural elements will require work in the coming months. You'll see a lot of this unfolding. You cannot cite the authority of the agreement to the various legal proceedings as the rationale. You have to cite that the United States has issued the revocation order and liquidated the duties, so that the issues that gave rise to those cases are no longer in play and are therefore mooted.
You're talking about the subsequent residual legal proceedings. That's the bulk of them and the reasons for their existence.