I certainly am aware of that, yes. That pobably clarified it.
I want to ask whether we can clear up the confusion that exists among remanufacturers. There are in Canada a number of remanufacturers, particularly in my province, I know. Some—or most of them—have signed on in support of the Softwood Lumber Agreement, and some haven't. There's a distinction of category in how they're viewed: those that are viewed on a first-mill status, and those that aren't. There's a different rate for them to pay, if we're into the trigger mechanism.
Could someone clarify that for the panel, please?